How the Global Agenda is implemented at a bureaucratic level
By Polly Inscore
October 31, 2025
AGENDA 2030-STYLE POLICY GOALS IN SMALL TOWNS: A WARNING FOR KANSANS
Agenda 2030 policies are often marketed using positive buzzwords – “sustainable development,” “revitalization,” and “smart growth.”
But in practice they can expand government authority, restrict private property rights, and increase dependency on centralized systems.
In a small town like Osawatomie, Kansas, these shifts happen quietly and incrementally.
1. CONTROL OF LAND THROUGH “WALKABLE COMMUNITIES”
Walking trails, bike paths, greenways, and “recreation corridors” may sound harmless, but they often:
• Require large public easements
• Expand government control over private land
• Allow surveillance, code enforcement access, and regulatory creep
• Become leverage to restrict development, fencing, parking, or usage
Over time, private land can be regulated into “public purpose” without ever being purchased.
2. EROSION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS
Under “nuisance,” “safety,” and “storage” language, cities can:
• Dictate how property looks
• Fine residents over aesthetics
• Threaten liens for unpaid penalties
• Eliminate common uses of garages, sheds, RVs, or extra vehicles
The endgame? Private land ownership becomes conditional – allowed only if residents obey ever-shifting standards.
3. CENTRALIZED CONTROL OF UTILITIES
A town dependent on a single municipal utility system is easy to control:
• Water rates become revenue tools
• Access can be pressured through liens or shutoffs
• Infrastructure decisions are made without voter input
• Funding often requires debt bonds paid for decades
When your only water source is government-controlled, your compliance becomes currency.
4. REGIONALISM & LOSS OF LOCAL VOICE
Inter-city partnerships, regional boards, and outside consultants dilute citizen influence. Residents lose the ability to push back because decisions are made by:
• Regional planners
• Private consultants
• Boards not directly elected by the people
5. MASSIVE DEBT FOR “SUSTAINABILITY PROJECTS”
Costly projects are packaged as “green,” “economic development,” or “future-proofing,” but they often:
• Increase property taxes
• Require perpetual grants
• Create dependency on federal compliance rules
Debt is a leash — once attached, the town must obey to get more funding.
6. DESTROY SMALL-TOWN INDEPENDENCE
Agenda 2030-style planning discourages:
• Small farms
• Homesteading
• Vehicle ownership
• Single-family land usage
It encourages:
• High-density housing
• Car-restrictions
• Central services
• Surveillance-friendly design
The goal is to move residents into controllable zones.
7. SURVEILLANCE THROUGH INFRASTRUCTURE
“Smart meters,” sensors, cameras, and digital utility management are marketed as “efficiency.”
In practice, they can:
• Track usage behavior
• Create profiles
• Penalize consumption
• Enable real-time shutoffs
Once installed, control happens with the click of a mouse.
8. PERMANENT DEPENDENCE ON GRANTS
Grants are not free money – they come with:
• Reporting requirements
• Compliance checklists
• Policy adoption mandates
Grants often lock in new staffing, equipment, or departments that the local tax base must fund permanently once the grant runs out.
THE END RESULT
If left unchecked, these policies lead to:
✅ centralized utilities
✅ regulated mobility
✅ conditioned property rights
✅ debt-backed spending
✅ constant surveillance
✅ dependency on grant flow
✅ diminished local sovereignty
A once-independent community becomes managed rather than represented.
WHAT CITIZENS CAN DO
• Attend every council meeting
• Demand fiscal transparency
• Challenge code expansions
• Request public records
• Object to permanent grant-dependent staffing
• Protect private land rights
• Elect representatives who believe in limited government
FREEDOM DOES NOT DISAPPEAR — IT IS REGULATED AWAY
One ordinance at a time.
One code expansion at a time.
One “revitalization grant” at a time.
Stay vigilant. Ask questions. Demand accountability.